// comparison
AegisRunner vs Cypress
Cypress has the best interactive developer experience for hand-authoring tests in Chromium. AegisRunner generates the tests for you across Chromium, Firefox, and WebKit — and bundles visual regression, audits, scheduling and parallel CI on every plan.
Side-by-side
| Feature | Cypress | AegisRunner |
|---|---|---|
| Test creation | You write every test in JS/TS | |
| Browsers (free tier) | Chromium-family only | |
| Multi-tab / cross-origin | Limited — workarounds required | |
| Page discovery | Manual | |
| Auto-heal selectors | No — failed selectors fail tests | |
| Visual regression | Plugin (Percy, Applitools) | |
| Parallel CI runs | Cypress Cloud only — from $75/mo | |
| Test dashboard | Cypress Cloud only | |
| A11y / SEO / security | cypress-axe + Lighthouse plugins | |
| Free tier | OSS runner free; Cloud 500 results/mo | |
| Entry paid plan | $75/mo (Cloud Starter) | |
| Component testing | Yes — first-class React/Vue/Angular |
Comparison reflects publicly available information and may change as products evolve. Spotted something out of date? Tell us.
Frequently asked questions
Is AegisRunner a good Cypress alternative?
For regression testing — especially with cross-browser coverage (Firefox + WebKit), cross-origin flows, or zero authoring — yes. Cypress is still strong if you primarily test Chromium and like its time-travel debugger.
Does AegisRunner support Firefox and Safari?
Yes — Chromium, Firefox, and WebKit (Safari engine) on every plan. Cypress only supports Chromium-family browsers in its free tier.
What about parallel CI runs?
AegisRunner runs your suite on parallel cloud workers by default. Cypress requires Cypress Cloud ($75+/mo) for parallel execution.
Where does Cypress win?
Component testing — first-class React/Vue/Angular support. AegisRunner doesn't do component tests.
Try it on your own site
Paste a URL and get a full regression suite in minutes — free, no card required.
Start free